Karma - If a man is born in a poor family it is because of his past bad karma. If a man is born in a rich family it is because of his past good karma.
If a man is born with a congenital defect it is because of his past bad karma.
This is a very pernicious doctrine,for in this interpretation of karma,there is no room left for human effort. Everything is predeterminated for him by his past karma.
This change of language enables us to test it by the law of heredity. At the same time it does no harm to the doctrine either to its den jure or facto connotation.
This restatement make it possible to pose the questions which could not otherwise be posed and with to answering which the matter could not be made clear.
The first question is how is past karma inherited ?.
What is the process?
The second question is what is the nature of the past karma,in the terms of heredity?
Is it an inherent characteristic or ocquired characteristics? What do we inherit from our parent?
Starting with science the new individual begins When a sperm enter the egg,fertilization consists in fusion of the head of the sperm with the nucleus of the egg. According to science a child inherits the characteristics of his parents.
Suppose, a man were to steal another mans mangos,would the thief deserve punishment?
Suppose, a man were to steal another mans mangos,would the thief deserve punishment?
Yes. But he would not have stolen the mango's the other set in the ground.
Why would he deserve punishment? Because those he stole were the result of those that were planted .
Just so,this name and form commits deeds either pure or impure ,and by that karma another name and form is reborn.
And therefore is it not set free from its evil deeds? When deeds are committed by one name and form,what becomes of those deeds?
The deeds would follow it,like a shadow that never leaves it.
Are you enjoying ? Keep reading.
Link here -
Buddhist law of Karma
As per Buddhism, there are five requests or cycles (niyama) which work in the physical and mental domains.
They are:
- Utu Niyama - actual inorganic request, for example occasional marvels of winds and rains. The unerring request of seasons, trademark occasional changes and occasions, reasons for winds and rains, nature of warmth, and so forth, all have a place with this gathering.
- Bija Niyama - request of germs and seeds (actual natural request), for example rice created from rice-seed, sweet taste from sugar-stick or nectar, curious qualities of specific organic products, and so forth The logical hypothesis of cells and qualities and the actual similitude of twins might be credited to this request.
- Karma Niyama - request of act and result, e.g., attractive and unfortunate acts produce relating great and awful outcomes. As clearly as water looks for its own level does as well karma, given chance, produce its inescapable outcome, not as a prize or discipline yet as an inborn grouping. This succession of deed and impact is as common and essential as the method of the sun and the moon.
- Dhamma Niyama - request of the standard, e.g., the regular wonders happening at the coming of a Bodhisattva in his last birth. Attractive energy and other comparable laws of nature. The regular explanation behind being acceptable, etc, might be remembered for this gathering.
- Citta Niyama - request or brain or mystic law, e.g., cycles of cognizance, emerging and dying of awareness, constituents of cognizance, intensity of brain, and so forth, including clairvoyance, telaesthesia, retro-perception, hunch, perceptiveness, clairaudience, thought-perusing and such other mystic marvels which are mystifying to current science.
Each psychological or actual wonder could be clarified by these sweeping five requests or cycles which are laws in themselves.
Karma as such is just one of these five requests. Like all other regular laws they request no lawgiver.
Link here -
Nature of Karma
In the working of karma there are pernicious and valuable powers and conditions to neutralize and uphold this self-working law.
Birth (gati) time or condition (kala) foundation of resurrection or indicating connection to resurrection (upadhi) and exertion (payoga) go about as such incredible guides and obstacles to the realization of karma.
Despite the fact that we are neither the totally the workers nor the bosses of our karma, it is obvious from these balancing and steady factors that the realization of karma is affected somewhat by
- outer conditions,
- environmental factors,
- character,
- singular endeavoring, etc.
It is this convention of karma that gives encouragement, expectation, dependence and good boldness to a Buddhist.
At the point when the startling occurs, and he meets with troubles, disappointments, and disaster, the Buddhist understands that he is harvesting what he has planted, and he is clearing off a past obligation.
Rather than leaving himself, leaving everything to Karma, he puts forth an exhausting attempt to pull the weeds and sow valuable seeds in their place, for what's to come is in his own hands.
He who trusts in karma doesn't denounce even the most bad, for they, as well, get their opportunity to change themselves at any second.
Despite the fact that bound to endure in woeful states, they have any desire for accomplishing interminable Peace.
By their own doings they have made their own Hells, and by their own doings they can make their own Heavens, as well.
A Buddhist who is completely persuaded of the law of karma doesn't go to another to be spared however certainly depends on him for his own liberation.
Rather than making any self-give up, or approaching any otherworldly office, he depends on his own resolution, and turns out ceaselessly for the prosperity and joy of all. This faith in karma approves his work and ignites his energy, since it shows singular duty.
To the standard Buddhist, karma fills in as an obstruction, while to a learned person, it fills in as in motivator to do great.
The person in question gets kind, open minded, and circumspect. This law of karma clarifies the issue of affliction, the authority of supposed destiny and fate of different religions and pretty much all the imbalance of humankind.
There is another grouping of karma as indicated by the time wherein impacts are worked out:
Quickly Effective (ditthadhammavedaniya) karma.
Thusly Effective (uppapajjavedaniya) karma.
Inconclusively Effective (aparapariyavedaniya) karma.
Dead or Ineffective (ahosi) karma.
Quickly Effective karma is what is knowledgeable about this current life.
As per the Abhidhamma one does both great and evil during the javana cycle (thought-impulsion), which typically goes on for seven idea minutes.
The impact of the principal thought-second, being the most vulnerable, one may procure in this life itself. This is known as the Immediately Effective karma.
In the event that it doesn't work in this life, it is called 'Dead or Ineffective' karma.
The following most fragile is the seventh idea second. Its impact one may procure in the aftereffect birth. This is called 'Along these lines Effective' karma.
This, as well, is called Defunct or Ineffective karma in the event that it doesn't work in the subsequent birth.
The impact of the transitional idea minutes may occur whenever until one accomplishes Nibbana.
This sort of karma is known as 'Inconclusively Effective' karma.
Nobody, not even the Buddhas and Arahantas, is absolved from this class of karma which one may involvement with the course of one's meandering in Samsara.
There is no unique class of karma known as Defunct or Ineffective, however when such activities that should create their belongings in this life or in an ensuing life don't work, they are named Defunct or Ineffective karma.
(D) The last characterization of karma is as indicated by the plane where the impact happens, in particular:
Underhanded Actions (akusala kamma) which may mature in the aware planes (kammaloka). (Six divine planes in addition to one human plane in addition to four woeful planes = eleven kamaloka planes.) Here are just four woeful kamalokas.
Great Actions (kusala kamma) which may age in the conscious planes aside from the four woeful planes.
Great Actions (kusala kamma) which may age in the Realm of Form (rupa brahamalokas). There are four Arupa Brahma .
Link here -
Effect Of Karma
Obliviousness (avijja), or not knowing things as they genuinely may be, is the central reason for karma. Subject to obliviousness emerge exercises (avijja paccaya samkhara) states the Buddha in the Paticca Samuppada (Dependent Origination).
Related with obliviousness is the partner hankering (tanha), the other base of karma. Detestable activities are adapted by these two causes.
All great deeds of a worldling (putthujana), however connected with the three healthy foundations of liberality (alobha), generosity (adosa) and information (amoha), are in any case viewed as karma on the grounds that the two underlying foundations of obliviousness and needing are torpid in him.
The ethical kinds of Supramundane Path Consciousness (magga citta) are not viewed as karma since they will in general destroy the two underlying drivers.
Who is the practitioner of karma?
Who harvests the product of karma?
Does karma form a spirit?
In responding to these inconspicuous inquiries, the Venerable Buddhaghosa writes in the Visuddhi Magga:
"No practitioner is there who carries out the thing;
Nor is there one who feels the organic product;
Constituent parts alone move on;
This undoubtedly! Is correct wisdom."
For example, the table we see is evident reality. From an extreme perspective the alleged table comprises of powers and characteristics.
For common purposes a researcher would utilize the term water, yet in the lab he would state H 2 0.
In this equivalent manner, for traditional purposes, such terms as man, lady, acting naturally, etc are utilized.
The alleged brief structures comprise of psychophysical marvels, which are continually changing not continuing as before for two back to back minutes.
Buddhists, accordingly, don't have confidence in a perpetual element, in an entertainer separated from activity, in a perceiver separated from recognition, in a cognizant subject behind awareness.
Who at that point, is the practitioner of karma? Who encounters the impact?
Volition, or Will (tetana), is itself the practitioner, Feeling (vedana) is itself the gatherer of the products of activities. Aside from these unadulterated mental states (suddhadhamma) there is nobody to plant and nobody to harvest.
Link here -
Karma and Vipaka
karma is activity, and Vipaka, natural product or result, is its response.
Similarly as each article is joined by a shadow, even so every volitional action is unavoidably joined by its due impact.
karma resembles possible seed: Vipaka could be compared to the natural product emerging from the tree – the impact or result.
Anisamsa and Adinaya are the leaves, blossoms, etc that relate to outside contrasts, for example, wellbeing, affliction and destitution – these are unavoidable results, which occur simultaneously. Carefully, both Karma and Vipaka relate to the psyche.
As karma might be fortunate or unfortunate, so may Vipaka, - the natural product – is positive or negative.
As karma is mental so Vipaka is mental (of the psyche). It is experienced as satisfaction, rapture, despondency or hopelessness, as per the idea of the karma seed.
Anisamsa are the associative preferences – material things, for example, flourishing, wellbeing and life span.
- At the point when Vipaka's attendant material things are disadvantageous, they are known as Adinaya, brimming with horror,
- and show up as destitution,
- offensiveness,
- sickness,
- short life expectancy, etc.
As we sow, we harvest some place and at some point, in his life or in a future birth. What we procure today is the thing that we have planted either in the present or previously.
The Samyutta Nikaya states:
- "As indicated by the seed that is planted,
- So is the organic product you procure there from,
- Practitioner of kindness assemble great,
- Practitioner of abhorrent, evil procures,
- Down is the seed and thou shalt taste
The organic product thereof."
karma is a law in itself, which works in its own field without the intercession of any outer, free decision organization.
Joy and wretchedness, which are the basic part of humankind, are the unavoidable impacts of causes.
From a Buddhist perspective, they are not prizes and disciplines, relegated by an otherworldly, omniscient decision capacity to a spirit that has done great or malevolence.
Theists,
- who endeavor to clarify everything in this and transient life and in the everlasting future life, overlooking a past,
- have confidence in a 'posthumous' equity,
- and may view present satisfaction and hopelessness as endowments and condemnations gave on His creation by an omniscient and supreme Divine Ruler who sits in paradise above controlling the predeterminations of mankind.
Buddhism, which unequivocally denies quite an Almighty, All kind God-Creator and a subjectively made undying soul, puts stock in common law and equity which can't be suspended by either an Almighty God or an All-humane Buddha.
As per this common law, acts bear their own prizes and disciplines to the individual practitioner if human equity discovers.
There are some who censure consequently: "Thus, you Buddhists, as well, regulate free enterprise opium to the individuals, saying: "You are brought into the world poor in this life because of your past detestable karma.
He is brought into the world rich by virtue of his great karma. Thus, be happy with your modest parcel; yet do great to be wealthy in your next life. You are being abused now due to your past detestable karma.
Conclusion -
There is your fate. Be unassuming and bear your sufferings quietly. Do great at this point. You can be sure of a superior and more joyful eternal life."
The Buddhist teaching of karma doesn't elucidate such silly fatalistic perspectives. Nor does it vindicate a posthumous equity.
The All-Merciful Buddha, who had no ulterior childish thought processes, didn't show this law of karma to secure the rich and solace the poor by promising fanciful bliss in an eternity.
